AtScale, Inc.
Held is read from USPTO's recorded assignments; a transfer never recorded there does not appear.
0
Ending by 2030
Mar 2035
Next term end
When these terms end
Held patents by the year their term ends
20262027202820292030203120322033203420352036203720382039204020412042204320442045
Fee deadlines
Maintenance fees fall due 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years after grant. A missed fee ends a patent at the end of the six month grace period that follows, not on the due date.
- 1 fee due May 5, 2027The maintenance fee for Data model design collaboration using semantically correct collaborative objects (US 10,467,250) comes due May 5, 2027. Unpaid by Nov 5, 2027, it lapses early.
- 1 fee due Jun 26, 2027The maintenance fee for Dynamic aggregate generation and updating for high performance querying of large datasets (US 11,853,283) comes due Jun 26, 2027. Unpaid by Dec 27, 2027, it lapses early.
- 2 fees due Jul 7, 2027
- 1 fee due Aug 13, 2027The maintenance fee for Data aggregation and pre-positioning for multi-store queries (US 11,899,665) comes due Aug 13, 2027. Unpaid by Feb 14, 2028, it lapses early.
Recent changes
Nothing was recorded against this company's patents in the last 90 days.
Patents held now
Soonest term end first. Each date below is computed on that patent's own page, which shows the rule, the adjustments and the fee history it was derived from.
| Patent | Title | Status | Expires | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 9,946,780 | Interpreting relational database statements using a virtual multidimensional data model In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 9,600,554 | Interpreting relational database statements using a virtual multidimensional data model In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 11,853,283 | Dynamic aggregate generation and updating for high performance querying of large datasets In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 10,530,779 | Data Access Authorization for Dynamically Generated Database Structures In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 11,494,362 | Dynamic aggregate generation and updating for high performance querying of large datasets In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 9,948,655 | Data Access Authorization for Dynamically Generated Database Structures In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 12,701,119 | Data Access Authorization for Dynamically Generated Database Structures In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 11,394,716 | Data Access Authorization for Dynamically Generated Database Structures In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 10,783,014 | Data statement monitoring and control In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 10,185,607 | Data Statement Monitoring and Control In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence |
Also on record, not counted in the 25: 1 lapsed for an unpaid fee. List them
Sources and methods
Compiled from the USPTO record, grants, published applications and recorded assignments, not yet reviewed by hand.
How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
Published applications
US patent applications published under this name that have not become patents. An application is published about eighteen months after its earliest filing; one that has not been published is in no public record.
3 pending · 1 no status recorded