Breker Verification Systems
Held is read from USPTO's recorded assignments; a transfer never recorded there does not appear.
3
Ending by 2030
Sep 2027
Next term end
When these terms end
Held patents by the year their term ends
20262027202820292030203120322033203420352036203720382039204020412042204320442045
Fee deadlines
Maintenance fees fall due 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years after grant. A missed fee ends a patent at the end of the six month grace period that follows, not on the due date.
- 1 fee due Jan 30, 2027The maintenance fee for Scheduling of scenario models for execution within different computer threads and scheduling of memory regions for use with the scenario models (US 10,365,326) comes due Jan 30, 2027. Unpaid by Jul 30, 2027, it lapses early.
- 1 fee due Mar 5, 2027The maintenance fee for Scheduling of scenario models for execution within different computer threads and scheduling of memory regions for use with the scenario models (US 11,748,240) comes due Mar 5, 2027. Unpaid by Sep 7, 2027, it lapses early.
- 1 fee due Apr 1, 2027The maintenance fee for Testing SOC with portable scenario models and at different levels (US 10,429,442) comes due Apr 1, 2027. Unpaid by Oct 1, 2027, it lapses early.
- 2 fees due Oct 12 to 19, 2027 · next Oct 12
Recent changes
Nothing was recorded against this company's patents in the last 90 days.
Patents held now
Soonest term end first. Each date below is computed on that patent's own page, which shows the rule, the adjustments and the fee history it was derived from.
| Patent | Title | Status | Expires | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 7,849,425 | Generating self-checking test cases from a reduced case analysis graph using path inheritance In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 7,823,100 | Generating self-checking test cases from a reduced case analysis graph using path constraints In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 7,779,374 | Generating self-checking test cases from reduced case analysis graphs In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 9,310,433 | Testing SOC with portable scenario models and at different levels In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 9,316,689 | Scheduling of scenario models for execution within different computer threads and scheduling of memory regions for use with the scenario models In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 9,360,523 | Display in a graphical format of test results generated using scenario models In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 9,651,619 | Scheduling of scenario models for execution within different computer threads and scheduling of memory regions for use with the scenario models In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 9,689,921 | Testing SoC with portable scenario models and at different levels In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 9,874,608 | Scheduling of scenario models for execution within different computer threads and scheduling of memory regions for use with the scenario models In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record | |
| US 10,365,326 | Scheduling of scenario models for execution within different computer threads and scheduling of memory regions for use with the scenario models In force · From the USPTO record | In force | From the USPTO record |
Sources and methods
Compiled from the USPTO record, grants, published applications and recorded assignments, not yet reviewed by hand.
How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
Published applications
Every application published under this name has become a patent.