Generating Wireless Coverage Maps
A patent family: one line of work, grouped by real continuity rather than by a technology label
inferred from titles. In-force patents first, soonest term end first, then patent number. Expired patents follow, in the same order.
| Patent | Title | Holder | Status | Expires | Time remaining | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 12,538,150 | Synchronization/Resynchronization of Data Assets Based on Wireless Dead Zone Geofence Changes In force · High confidence | Intergraph Corporation | In force | High confidence | ||
| US 12,628,013 | Identifying Data Assets Needed in a Wireless Dead Zone In force · High confidence | Intergraph Corporation | In force | High confidence | ||
| US 12,408,003 | Synchronization/Resynchronization of Data Assets Based on Entering a Wireless Dead Zone Geofence In force · High confidence | Intergraph Corporation | In force | High confidence | ||
| US 12,425,894 | Predicting Future Wireless Coverage Based on Weather In force · High confidence | Intergraph Corporation | In force | High confidence | ||
| US 12,501,278 | Generating Wireless Coverage Maps In force · High confidence | Intergraph Corporation | In force | High confidence |
5 of 5 records shown. In-force patents first, soonest term end first, then patent number. Expired patents follow, in the same order.
Updated Nov 15, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 15, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.