Intragastric Device (2009)
A patent family: one line of work, grouped by real continuity rather than by a technology label
inferred from titles. 7 of these applications claim priority to application 61/105,932, filed Oct 16, 2008. A shared origin can cover several different claimed inventions, which is why members here may not share a title. In-force patents first, soonest term end first, then patent number. Expired patents follow, in the same order.
| Patent | Title | Holder | Status | Expires | Time remaining | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 7,854,745 | Intragastric Device In force · High confidence | Reshape Lifesciences Inc. | In force | High confidence | ||
| US 8,162,969 | Intragastric Device In force · High confidence | Reshape Lifesciences Inc. | In force | High confidence | ||
| US 8,845,674 | Intragastric Device In force · High confidence | Reshape Lifesciences Inc. | In force | High confidence | ||
| US 9,539,132 | Intragastric Device In force · High confidence | Reshape Lifesciences Inc. | In force | High confidence | ||
| US 10,327,936 | Intragastric Device In force · High confidence | Reshape Lifesciences Inc. | In force | High confidence | ||
| US 12,090,075 | Intragastric Device In force · Medium confidence | Reshape Lifesciences Inc. | In force | Medium confidence | ||
| US 11,219,543 | Intragastric Device In force · High confidence | Reshape Lifesciences Inc. | In force | High confidence |
7 of 7 records shown. In-force patents first, soonest term end first, then patent number. Expired patents follow, in the same order.
Updated Nov 15, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 15, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.