14 patents currently held
Held is read from USPTO's recorded assignments; a transfer never recorded there does not appear.
The next term ends in May 2028. from the record
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
10
Ending by 2030
May 2028
Next term end
12
Patent families
When these terms end
Held patents by the year their term ends
notable patents
all others
Updated Nov 15, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 15, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
Notable: the highest-ranked patents in this portfolio by citations and family size.
Notable patents
Ranked by citations and family size, against patents of the same kind granted the same year. How we rank
Notable
Ends Jan 2031 · High confidence
Also notable
Ends May 2030 · High confidence
Also notable
Ends Apr 2030 · High confidence
Multi-Strategy Generation of Product Recommendations
US 8,244,564
The most cited patent in this portfolio, cited by 153 later US patents, top 5% of utility patents granted in 2012 in our data. Protection runs to 2031.
System and Process for Improving Product Recommendations for Use in Providing Personalized Advertisements to Retail Customers
US 8,364,528
Cited by 93 later US patents, top 10% of utility patents granted in 2013 in our data, and renewed at 3 of 3 maintenance windows. Protection runs to 2030.
System and Method for Providing Targeted Content
US 8,209,214
Renewed at every maintenance window since the 2012 grant; no more fees are due before its term ends in 2030.
Fee deadlines
Maintenance fees fall due 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years after grant. A missed fee ends a patent at the end of the six month grace period that follows, not on the due date.
- 1 fee due Mar 24, 2027The maintenance fee for Performing Personalized Category-Based Product Sorting (US 10,423,999) comes due Mar 24, 2027. Unpaid by Sep 24, 2027, it lapses early.
Recent changes
Nothing was recorded against this company's patents in the last 90 days.
What they patent
The 5 largest of its 12 families, grouped by real patent family and labeled by the earliest filing in each. No technology classification is inferred from titles.
Patents held now
Soonest term end first.
| Patent | Title | Status | Expires | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 8,924,265 | System and Process for Improving Product Recommendations for Use in Providing Personalized Advertisements to Retail Customers In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 8,108,463 | Demand-Driven, Collaborative Systems and Processes for Collecting Structured Information In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 8,583,524 | System and Process for Improving Recommendations for Use in Providing Personalized Advertisements to Retail Customers In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 8,156,138 | System and Method for Providing Targeted Content In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 8,019,642 | System and Process for Receiving Boosting Recommendations for Use in Providing Personalized Advertisements to Retail Customers In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 8,108,329 | System and Process for Boosting Recommendations for Use in Providing Personalized Advertisements to Retail Customers In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,639,846 | System and Method for Providing Targeted Content In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 8,209,214 | System and Method for Providing Targeted Content In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 8,364,528 | System and Process for Improving Product Recommendations for Use in Providing Personalized Advertisements to Retail Customers In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 8,250,139 | Demand-Driven, Collaborative Systems and Processes for Collecting Structured Information In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence |
Also on record, not counted in the 14: 11 applications abandoned. List them
Sources and methods
Compiled from USPTO application file histories, grants and recorded assignments, with the company's own names reviewed by hand. How this record was built
Portfolio grouped automatically from ownership conveyances to the names matched to this company, usually every name that begins with its own, so it counts patents an affiliate holds; each list row names the holder of record. Security interests are excluded and ambiguous records are not reviewed by hand.
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.