11 patents currently held
Held is read from USPTO's recorded assignments; a transfer never recorded there does not appear.
The next term ends in Oct 2033. from the record
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
0
Ending by 2030
Oct 2033
Next term end
4
Patent families
When these terms end
Held patents by the year their term ends
notable patents
all others
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
Notable: the highest-ranked patents in this portfolio by citations and family size.
Notable patents
Ranked by citations and family size, against patents of the same kind granted the same year. How we rank
Notable
Ends Oct 2033 · High confidence
Also notable
Ends Nov 2038 · High confidence
Also notable
Ends Jan 2044 · High confidence
Method and System for Assessment of Cognitive Function Based on Mobile Device Usage
US 9,538,948
The most cited patent in this portfolio, cited by 115 later US patents, top 5% of utility patents granted in 2017 in our data. Protection runs to 2033.
Modeling Analysis of Team Behavior and Communication
US 11,651,165
Cited by 4 later US patents, top 25% of utility patents granted in 2023 in our data. Protection runs to 2038. A terminal disclaimer caps this term to an earlier patent's.
Systems and Methods for Determining States Using Run-Length Encoders, Binarized Bins, and K-Means Cluster Models
US 12,481,724
Granted 2025. Too new for citation comparison; protection runs to 2044.
Fee deadlines
No maintenance fee falls due on this company's record before Nov 10, 2027.
Recent changes
- 1 of the patents on this record was granted since Aug 16, 2026
What they patent
The 3 largest of its 4 families, grouped by real patent family and labeled by the earliest filing in each. No technology classification is inferred from titles.
Patents held now
Soonest term end first.
| Patent | Title | Status | Expires | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 9,538,948 | Method and System for Assessment of Cognitive Function Based on Mobile Device Usage In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,687,187 | Method and System For Assessment of Cognitive Function Based on Mobile Device Usage In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,693,724 | Method and System for Assessment of Cognitive Function Based on Electronic Device Usage In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,420,970 | Method and System for Assessment of Cognitive Function Based on Mobile Device Usage In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,474,481 | Method and System for Assessment of Cognitive Function Based on Electronic Device Usage In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 12,265,793 | Modeling Analysis of Team Behavior and Communication In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 11,468,242 | Psychological State Analysis of Team Behavior and Communication In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 10,860,805 | Computerized Analysis of Team Behavior and Communication to Quantify and Optimize Team Function In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 11,651,165 | Modeling Analysis of Team Behavior and Communication In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 12,481,724 | Systems and Methods for Determining States Using Run-Length Encoders, Binarized Bins, and K-Means Cluster Models In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence |
Also on record, not counted in the 11: 2 applications pending · 5 applications abandoned. List them
Sources and methods
Compiled from USPTO application file histories, grants and recorded assignments, with the company's own names reviewed by hand. How this record was built
Portfolio grouped automatically from ownership conveyances to the names matched to this company, usually every name that begins with its own, so it counts patents an affiliate holds; each list row names the holder of record. Security interests are excluded and ambiguous records are not reviewed by hand.
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.