Device, Strap and Garment for Treating Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders and for Repairing Sports Injury, and Method for Making Same
US 10,238,572 In forceTerm ends May 8, 2028 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ended Sep 22, 2026
Why Medium: A parent in the chain could not be resolved.
Sep 22, 2006
May 8, 2028
Mar 26, 2019
How we calculated this date
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Sep 22, 2006, when the earliest non-provisional application in its chain was filed (this one was filed Apr 9, 2015); a parent in its chain could not be resolved (the next row) | Sep 22, 2026 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | A parent in the chain could not be resolved | dated from this application's own claim | Medium confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +594 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | May 8, 2028 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 2 of 2 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | May 8, 2028 | Medium confidence |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Not on this page: the patent's family, its recorded assignments and its citation count. USPTO's assignment records, linked above, list every recorded assignment.
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.