Term ends Oct 8, 2034 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ends Oct 8, 2034
Why Medium: A parent in the chain could not be resolved.
Held by OSRAM GmbH
Filed Jul 13, 2017 as application 15/649,385 · Granted Jul 14, 2020
Base term plus 321 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) · capped by a resolved terminal disclaimer
Today
2014
2034
Clock starts
Oct 8, 2014
Oct 8, 2014
Term ends
Oct 8, 2034
Oct 8, 2034
Granted
Jul 14, 2020
Jul 14, 2020
base term
fee events
Updated Nov 15, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 15, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
321
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
Capped
Terminal disclaimer
Resolved from the filed document, referencing US 9,725,646.
1 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
6
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term runs 321 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. A terminal disclaimer resolved from the filed document caps it earlier. 1 of 3 maintenance fees is paid so far. Confidence: Medium. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Oct 8, 2014, when application PCT/EP2014/071544, the earliest non-provisional in its chain, was filed (this one was filed Jul 13, 2017); a parent in its chain could not be resolved (the next row) | Oct 8, 2034 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | A parent in the chain could not be resolved | dated from this application's own claim | Medium confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +321 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Aug 25, 2035 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | Disclaimer resolved from the filed document (refs US 9,725,646) | capped to Oct 8, 2034 | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 1 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Oct 8, 2034 | Medium confidence |
This family
| US 9,719,013 | In force Oct 2034 | Oct 2034 |
| US 9,719,014 | In force no later than Oct 2034 | no later than Oct 2034 |
| US 9,725,646 | In force Oct 2034 | Oct 2034 |
| US 10,711,191 | this patent Oct 2034 | Oct 2034 |
| US 11,292,965 | In force Oct 2034 | Oct 2034 |
5 of 6 applications in this family shown, earliest filings first. The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Oct 2034
Term ends Oct 8, 2034. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Note
The 321 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Disclaimer cap
This term is capped by a terminal disclaimer resolved from the filed document, referencing US 9,725,646.
Citations
2
later US patents cite this one
That is below the median of utility patents granted in 2020 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.