Term ends Sep 24, 2034 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ends Sep 24, 2034
Why Medium: A parent in the chain could not be resolved.
Held by Tae Technologies, Inc.
Filed Aug 26, 2019 as application 16/551,046 · Granted Sep 29, 2020
Base term, 20 years from filing
Today
2014
2034
Clock starts
Sep 24, 2014
Sep 24, 2014
Term ends
Sep 24, 2034
Sep 24, 2034
Granted
Sep 29, 2020
Sep 29, 2020
base term
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
None
Term adjustment
No prosecution delay on this record.
No effect
Terminal disclaimer
Resolved from the filed document, referencing US 10,438,702, to Sep 24, 2034. The term already ends on or before that date, so the cap shortened nothing.
1 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
6
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term is its 20-year base term, with no adjustment for prosecution delay. A terminal disclaimer is resolved from the filed document, and it ends no earlier than this term, so it shortens nothing. 1 of 3 maintenance fees is paid so far. Confidence: Medium. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Sep 24, 2014, when application PCT/US2014/057157, the earliest non-provisional in its chain, was filed (this one was filed Aug 26, 2019); a parent in its chain could not be resolved (the next row) | Sep 24, 2034 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | A parent in the chain could not be resolved | dated from this application's own claim | Medium confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | Disclaimer resolved from the filed document (refs US 10,438,702) | resolves to Sep 24, 2034, no earlier than this term, so no change | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 1 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Sep 24, 2034 | Medium confidence |
This family
| Application PCT/US2014/057157 | PCT application no patent term | no patent term |
| US 10,049,774 | In force Nov 2034 | Nov 2034 |
| US 10,438,702 | In force Sep 2034 | Sep 2034 |
| US 10,790,064 | this patent Sep 2034 | Sep 2034 |
| US 11,373,763 | In force Sep 2034 | Sep 2034 |
5 of 6 applications in this family shown, earliest filings first. The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Sep 2034
Term ends Sep 24, 2034. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Terminal disclaimer
A terminal disclaimer resolved from the filed document, referencing US 10,438,702, ends no earlier than this term, so it caps nothing.
Citations
8
later US patents cite this one
That is top 25% of utility patents granted in 2020 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.