Term ends Mar 25, 2035 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ends Mar 25, 2035
Why Medium: A parent in the chain could not be resolved.
Held by Spotify AB
Filed Jun 4, 2019 as application 16/431,645 · Granted Jul 6, 2021
Base term, 20 years from filing
Today
2015
2035
Clock starts
Mar 25, 2015
Mar 25, 2015
Term ends
Mar 25, 2035
Mar 25, 2035
Granted
Jul 6, 2021
Jul 6, 2021
base term
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
None
Term adjustment
No prosecution delay on this record.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
1 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
6
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term is its 20-year base term, with no adjustment for prosecution delay. 1 of 3 maintenance fees is paid so far. Confidence: Medium. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Mar 25, 2015, when application 14/668,732, the earliest non-provisional in its chain, was filed (this one was filed Jun 4, 2019); a parent in its chain could not be resolved (the next row) | Mar 25, 2035 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | A parent in the chain could not be resolved | dated from this application's own claim | Medium confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 1 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Mar 25, 2035 | Medium confidence |
This family
| US 9,112,849 | In force Mar 2035 | Mar 2035 |
| US 9,432,428 | In force Mar 2035 | Mar 2035 |
| US 9,288,200 | In force Mar 2035 | Mar 2035 |
| US 9,935,943 | In force Mar 2035 | Mar 2035 |
| US 10,313,331 | In force Mar 2035 | Mar 2035 |
| US 11,057,370 | this patent Mar 2035 | Mar 2035 |
The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2019 Reel 51199, frame 165 | Ahlin, Oskar Werkelin; Sigfrids, Karl; Kirkpatrick, Jamie; Titmuss, Richard; Shrubsole, Evan; Eckerdal, Per | Spotify AB | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Mar 2035
Term ends Mar 25, 2035. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Citations
0
later US patents cite this one
That is below the median of utility patents granted in 2021 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.