Determining a Display Order of Learning Modules at a Computing Device Based on an Upcoming Calendar Event
US 11,487,833 In forceTerm ends Jun 23, 2036 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ends Mar 9, 2036
Why Medium: No fee event states this; the fee state is read from the payments the fee record holds.
Mar 9, 2016
Jun 23, 2036
Nov 1, 2022
How we calculated this date
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Mar 9, 2016, when the earliest non-provisional application in its chain was filed (this one was filed Dec 2, 2019) | Mar 9, 2036 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +106 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Jun 23, 2036 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | No fee events in USPTO's record of this patent. A gap in the record, not evidence of lapse | In force | Medium confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Jun 23, 2036 | Medium confidence |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Not on this page: the patent's family, its recorded assignments and its citation count. USPTO's assignment records, linked above, list every recorded assignment.
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.