Chimeric Antigen Receptors Against Axl or ROR2 and Methods of Use Thereof
US 12,187,801 In forceTerm ends Jun 30, 2036 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ends Jan 17, 2038
Why Medium: The disclaimer's references carry disclaimers of their own not yet read (US 11,897,959), so the cap could be lower.
Jan 17, 2018
Jun 30, 2036
Jan 7, 2025
How we calculated this date
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Jan 17, 2018, when the earliest non-provisional application in its chain was filed (this one was filed Jul 16, 2019) | Jan 17, 2038 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +1252 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Jun 22, 2041 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | Disclaimer resolved from the filed document (refs US 11,111,288, US 11,149,088, US 11,897,959) | capped to Jun 30, 2036 | Medium confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 0 of 2 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Jun 30, 2036 | Medium confidence |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Not on this page: the patent's family, its recorded assignments and its citation count. USPTO's assignment records, linked above, list every recorded assignment.
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.