Systems, Devices, and Methods to Compensate for Temperature Effects on Sensors
US 12,478,298 In forceTerm ends Jan 22, 2039 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ends Jan 22, 2039
Why Medium: The disclaimer's references carry disclaimers of their own not yet read (US 11,484,233), so the cap could be lower.
Jan 22, 2019
Jan 22, 2039
Nov 25, 2025
How we calculated this date
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Jan 22, 2019, when the earliest non-provisional application in its chain was filed (this one was filed Oct 6, 2022) | Jan 22, 2039 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +408 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Mar 5, 2040 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | Disclaimer resolved from the filed document (refs US 11,484,233) | capped to Jan 22, 2039 | Medium confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 0 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Jan 22, 2039 | Medium confidence |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Not on this page: the patent's family, its recorded assignments and its citation count. USPTO's assignment records, linked above, list every recorded assignment.
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.