Methods and Systems for High-Magnification Photography Exploiting Reflective Polarizers and Faraday Rotators
US 12,717,122 In forceTerm ends Jan 25, 2043 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ends Jan 24, 2043
Why Medium: A parent in the chain could not be resolved.
Jan 24, 2023
Jan 25, 2043
Aug 25, 2026
How we calculated this date
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Jan 24, 2023, when the earliest non-provisional application in its chain was filed (this one was filed Jul 24, 2024); a parent in its chain could not be resolved (the next row) | Jan 24, 2043 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | A parent in the chain could not be resolved | dated from this application's own claim | Medium confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +1 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Jan 25, 2043 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 0 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Jan 25, 2043 | Medium confidence |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Not on this page: the patent's family, its recorded assignments and its citation count. USPTO's assignment records, linked above, list every recorded assignment.
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.