Also listed on Pixim, Inc., an earlier holder on the record. The recorded assignments below show how it moved.
Term ends Jun 15, 2029 · High confidence
20-year base term ends Jan 29, 2029
Held by Pixim Israel Ltd.
Filed Jan 29, 2009 as application 12/361,739 · Granted Dec 14, 2010
Base term plus 137 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2009
2029
Clock starts
Jan 29, 2009
Jan 29, 2009
Term ends
Jun 15, 2029
Jun 15, 2029
Granted
Dec 14, 2010
Dec 14, 2010
base term
patent term adjustment
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
137
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
3 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
This patent's term runs 137 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. All three maintenance fees are recorded paid; no more fees are due. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Jan 29, 2009, when this application, 12/361,739, was filed | Jan 29, 2029 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +137 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Jun 15, 2029 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 3 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Jun 15, 2029 | High confidence |
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2010 Reel 23820, frame 866 | Koifman, Vladimir; Eshel, Noam; Golan, Zeituni | Advasense Technologies (2004) Ltd. | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Jul 25, 2011 Reel 26641, frame 85 | Advasense Technologies (2004) Ltd., a Corporation Organized Under the Laws of Israel | Comerica Bank, a Texas Banking Association | Security Agreement |
| Sep 13, 2012 Reel 28959, frame 493 | Comerica Bank | Advasense Technologies (2004) Ltd. | Release of Security Interest |
| Jan 14, 2013 Reel 29622, frame 103 | Advasense Technologies (2004) Ltd. | Pixim Israel Ltd. | Change of Name |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Jun 2029
Term ends Jun 15, 2029. No further fees fall due before then
Note
The 137 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
2
later US patents cite this one
That is below the median of utility patents granted in 2010 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.