Term ends Dec 27, 2033 · High confidence
20-year base term ended Nov 3, 2023
Filed Nov 3, 2003 as application 10/700,686 · Granted Dec 31, 2013
Base term plus 3707 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2003
2033
Clock starts
Nov 3, 2003
Nov 3, 2003
Term ends
Dec 27, 2033
Dec 27, 2033
Granted
Dec 31, 2013
Dec 31, 2013
base term
patent term adjustment
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
3,707
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
3 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
This patent's term runs 3707 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. All three maintenance fees are recorded paid; no more fees are due. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Nov 3, 2003, when this application, 10/700,686, was filed | Nov 3, 2023 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +3707 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Dec 27, 2033 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 3 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Dec 27, 2033 | High confidence |
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2003 Reel 14839, frame 173 | Nelms, David W. | Discover Financial Services | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| May 10, 2006 Reel 17596, frame 284 | Discover Financial Services, Inc. | Discover Financial Services LLC | Change of Name |
| Jan 7, 2010 Reel 23741, frame 637 | Discover Financial Services LLC | DFS Services LLC | Change of Name |
| Apr 6, 2022 Reel 59645, frame 56 | Nelms, David W. | Discover Financial Services, Inc. | Corrective Assignment to Correct the Receiving Party Data Name Previously Recorded at Reel: 014839 Frame: 0173. Assignor(S) Hereby Confirms the Assignment. |
| Jul 2, 2025 Reel 71784, frame 903 | Discover Financial Services | Capital One Financial Corporation | Merger |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Dec 2033
Term ends Dec 27, 2033. No further fees fall due before then
Note
The 3707 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
81
later US patents cite this one
That is top 10% of utility patents granted in 2013 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.