Term ends no later than Jun 29, 2030 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ends Nov 26, 2029
In force on USPTO's status record and by its fee record. A terminal disclaimer on file may shorten this term, possibly to a date already past; its reference document is unresolved, so the date above is an upper bound and no earlier date is guessed.
Held by Safran Aircraft Engines
Filed Sep 7, 2012 as application 13/607,341 · Granted Jun 23, 2015
Base term plus 215 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2009
2030
Clock starts
Nov 26, 2009
Nov 26, 2009
Ends no later than
Jun 29, 2030
Jun 29, 2030
Granted
Jun 23, 2015
Jun 23, 2015
base term
patent term adjustment
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
215
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
Unresolved
Terminal disclaimer
On file, reference document not resolved, so the date above is an upper bound. We do not guess the cap.
2 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
3
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term runs 215 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. A terminal disclaimer is on file with no resolved reference, so no cap is applied and none is guessed. 2 of 3 maintenance fees are paid so far. Confidence: Medium. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Nov 26, 2009, when application PCT/FR2009/052309, the earliest non-provisional in its chain, was filed (this one was filed Sep 7, 2012) | Nov 26, 2029 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +215 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Jun 29, 2030 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | Disclaimer on file (approved), reference document not resolved | no cap applied, and none guessed | Medium confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 2 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | no later than Jun 29, 2030 | Medium confidence |
This family
| US 9,080,454 | In force no later than Oct 2032 | no later than Oct 2032 |
| US 9,062,562 | this patent no later than Jun 2030 | no later than Jun 2030 |
2 of 3 applications in this family shown, earliest filings first. The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2013 Reel 29629, frame 101 | Coupe, Dominique; Roussille, Clement; Goering, Jonathan; Mateo, Julien; Eberling-fux, Nicolas; Renon, Guillaume; Beaujard, Antoine Jean-philippe; Fremont, Elric Georges Andre | Herakles; SNECMA | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Jan 15, 2013 reel/frame not recorded | Goering, Jonathan; Coupe, Dominique; Eberling-fux, Nicolas; Fremont, Elric Georges Andre; Mateo, Julien; Roussille, Clement; Beaujard, Antoine Jean-philippe; Renon, Guillaume | Herakles | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Jan 15, 2013 reel/frame not recorded | Goering, Jonathan; Coupe, Dominique; Eberling-fux, Nicolas; Fremont, Elric Georges Andre; Mateo, Julien; Roussille, Clement; Beaujard, Antoine Jean-philippe; Renon, Guillaume | SNECMA | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Apr 22, 2018 Reel 46678, frame 455 | Herakles | Safran Ceramics | Change of Name |
| May 23, 2018 Reel 46479, frame 807 | SNECMA | Safran Aircraft Engines | Change of Name |
| Aug 24, 2018 Reel 46939, frame 336 | SNECMA | Safran Aircraft Engines | Corrective Assignment to Correct the Cover Sheet to Remove Application Nos. 10250419, 10786507, 10786409, 12416418, 12531115, 12996294, 12094637 12416422 Previously Recorded on Reel 046479 Frame 0807. Assignor(S) Hereby Confirms the Change of Name. |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Jun 2030
Term ends no later than Jun 29, 2030. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Note
A terminal disclaimer is on file and its reference is not resolved. No cap is applied and none is guessed
Note
The 215 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Open question
A terminal disclaimer is on file (approved) and its reference document is not resolved. A disclaimer would cap the term earlier than Jun 29, 2030. We will not guess the cap.
Citations
24
later US patents cite this one
That is top 25% of utility patents granted in 2015 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
This computed term ends no later than the date shown; an unresolved terminal disclaimer may end it earlier. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.