Term ends Oct 16, 2034 · High confidence
20-year base term ends Jul 17, 2034
Held by Aramco Services Company
Filed Jul 17, 2014 as application 14/333,879 · Granted Apr 25, 2017
Base term plus 91 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2014
2034
Clock starts
Jul 17, 2014
Jul 17, 2014
Term ends
Oct 16, 2034
Oct 16, 2034
Granted
Apr 25, 2017
Apr 25, 2017
base term
patent term adjustment
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
91
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
2 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
5
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term runs 91 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. 2 of 3 maintenance fees are paid so far. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Jul 17, 2014, when this application, 14/333,879, was filed | Jul 17, 2034 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +91 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Oct 16, 2034 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 2 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Oct 16, 2034 | High confidence |
This family
| US 9,631,139 | this patent Oct 2034 | Oct 2034 |
| Application PCT/US2015/040842 | PCT application no patent term | no patent term |
| US 10,501,687 | In force Jul 2034 | Jul 2034 |
| US 11,041,117 | In force Jul 2034 | Jul 2034 |
| US 11,041,116 | In force Jul 2034 | Jul 2034 |
The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2014 Reel 33543, frame 493 | Rothrock, Ginger Denison; Johnson, Leah M.; Shepherd, Sarah | Rti International | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Aug 15, 2014 Reel 33543, frame 464 | Al-muntasheri, Ghaithan | Aramco Services Company | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Oct 2034
Term ends Oct 16, 2034. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Note
The 91 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
12
later US patents cite this one
That is above the median of utility patents granted in 2017 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.