Term ends Jun 23, 2032 · High confidence
20-year base term ends Nov 17, 2031
Held by Via Technologies, Inc.
Filed Dec 28, 2015 as application 14/980,209 · Granted Nov 28, 2017
Base term plus 219 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2011
2032
Clock starts
Nov 17, 2011
Nov 17, 2011
Term ends
Jun 23, 2032
Jun 23, 2032
Granted
Nov 28, 2017
Nov 28, 2017
base term
patent term adjustment
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
219
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
2 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
6
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term runs 219 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. 2 of 3 maintenance fees are paid so far. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Nov 17, 2011, when application 13/299,239, the earliest non-provisional in its chain, was filed (this one was filed Dec 28, 2015) | Nov 17, 2031 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +219 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Jun 23, 2032 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 2 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Jun 23, 2032 | High confidence |
This family
| US 8,972,707 | In force Feb 2033 | Feb 2033 |
| US 9,367,497 | In force Dec 2031 | Dec 2031 |
| US 10,126,793 | In force May 2032 | May 2032 |
| US 10,175,732 | In force Feb 2032 | Feb 2032 |
| US 9,829,945 | this patent Jun 2032 | Jun 2032 |
| US 10,409,347 | In force Nov 2031 | Nov 2031 |
The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2016 Reel 37790, frame 770 | Henry, G. Glenn; Gaskins, Darius D. | Via Technologies, Inc. | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Jun 2032
Term ends Jun 23, 2032. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Note
The 219 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
0
later US patents cite this one
That is below the median of utility patents granted in 2017 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.