Term ends Jun 23, 2034 · High confidence
20-year base term ends Jun 12, 2034
Held by Firefly Robotics, Inc.
Filed Jun 12, 2014 as application 14/303,316 · Granted Jun 14, 2016
Base term plus 11 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2014
2034
Clock starts
Jun 12, 2014
Jun 12, 2014
Term ends
Jun 23, 2034
Jun 23, 2034
Granted
Jun 14, 2016
Jun 14, 2016
base term
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
11
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
2 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
2
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term runs 11 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. 2 of 3 maintenance fees are paid so far. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Jun 12, 2014, when this application, 14/303,316, was filed | Jun 12, 2034 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +11 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Jun 23, 2034 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 2 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Jun 23, 2034 | High confidence |
This family
| US 9,363,937 | this patent Jun 2034 | Jun 2034 |
| US 10,155,632 | In force Jun 2034 | Jun 2034 |
The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2014 Reel 33092, frame 713 | Aposhian, Steven R.; Aston, Eric E.; Decker, William M.; Drake, Samuel | Firefly Equipment, LLC | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Dec 15, 2015 Reel 37300, frame 16 | Firefly Equipment, LLC | Firefly Automatix, Inc. | Change of Name |
| Apr 9, 2025 Reel 70785, frame 875 | Firefly Automatix, Inc. | Kirton McConkie PC | Security Interest |
| Jun 25, 2026 Reel 75825, frame 447 | Firefly Automatix, Inc. | Firefly Robotics, Inc. | Change of Name |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Jun 2034
Term ends Jun 23, 2034. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Note
The 11 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
3
later US patents cite this one
That is below the median of utility patents granted in 2016 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.